QUINTESSENTIALS Proposal intake / P48-40
P48-40
Motivated reasoning
Current proposed roles · editorial proposals, not accepted Card definitions.
Not acceptedConcept identity review
- Input id
- P48-40
- Original title
- Motivated reasoning
- Identity candidate ref
- QE48-C40
- Identity review status
- candidate_distinct_card_identity
- Historical roles recovered
- False
- Accepted identity
- False
Card coverage
Candidate only
Proposed concept boundary: Desired conclusions can influence evaluation of evidence.
Open decision
Distinguish motivation from generic confirmation; retain the separate E2 hold until its reactivation criteria are met.
Missing work
- Review concept identity and role ownership before authoring a Card.
- Author role-local scope, logic and required method, diagnostic, objective or action content for the selected functions.
- Record exact inspected sources and transformations, or explicitly review QE editorial synthesis with assertion-level evidence limits.
- Obtain editorial acceptance separately from structural validation.
Complete coverage record
- Input id
- P48-40
- Original title
- Motivated reasoning
- Candidate identity ref
- QE48-C40
- Proposed concept boundary
- Desired conclusions can influence evaluation of evidence.
- Active role refs
- P48-40/O1
- P48-40/E1
- Held role refs
- P48-40/E2
- Authored card ref
- Not specified
- Fixture identity ref
- Not specified
- Related authored card refs
- None recorded
- Ownership case refs
- R18C-06
- R18C-26
- R19C-59
- Coverage status
- candidate_only
- Unresolved decision
- Distinguish motivation from generic confirmation; retain the separate E2 hold until its reactivation criteria are met.
- Missing work
- Review concept identity and role ownership before authoring a Card.
- Author role-local scope, logic and required method, diagnostic, objective or action content for the selected functions.
- Record exact inspected sources and transformations, or explicitly review QE editorial synthesis with assertion-level evidence limits.
- Obtain editorial acceptance separately from structural validation.
- Accepted identity
- False
- Evidence status
- title_derived_editorial_proposal_not_verified
P48-40/E1 · Epistemic
Epistemic bottleneck
Desired conclusions can lead to unequal scrutiny or interpretation of favorable and unfavorable evidence, distorting an inference.
Super rootDistortion & Bias
Root familyBiased Evidence Evaluation
Parent familyNot assigned
Principle familyNot assigned
data/reconciliation/qe48-checkpoint4-resolutions.json
Review status and complete proposal
- Input id
- P48-40
- Title
- Motivated reasoning
- Owner ref
- QE48-C40
- Role id
- E1
- Stack
- Epistemic
- Proposed role type
- epistemic_bottleneck
- Effective role summary
- Desired conclusions can lead to unequal scrutiny or interpretation of favorable and unfavorable evidence, distorting an inference.
- Summary source
- Path
- data/reconciliation/qe48-checkpoint4-resolutions.json
- Collection
- rows
- Input id
- P48-40
- Stack
- Epistemic
- Role id
- E1
- Authority
- editorial_semantic_proposal
- Legacy summary ref
- data/reconciliation/qe48-checkpoint4-resolutions.json#P48-40/Epistemic/E1
- Adopted family ref
- QEF-E-BIASED-EVAL
- Full family path
- Super root
- Family id
- QEF-E-BIAS
- Label
- Distortion & Bias
- Root family
- Family id
- QEF-E-BIASED-EVAL
- Label
- Biased Evidence Evaluation
- Parent family
- Not specified
- Principle family
- Not specified
- Family precision
- provisional_broad_family
- Review status
- review_required_title_inferred_or_fixture_based
- Human accepted
- False
- Role ref
- P48-40/E1
- Record kind
- active_proposal
- Canonical type supported
- True
- Canonical readiness
- not_assessed_not_approved
P48-40/O1 · Ontological
World mechanic
A desired conclusion can influence how a person attends to or interprets supporting information.
Super rootSystems
Root familyCognitive Processes
Parent familyNot assigned
Principle familyNot assigned
data/reconciliation/qe48-checkpoint4-resolutions.json
Review status and complete proposal
- Input id
- P48-40
- Title
- Motivated reasoning
- Owner ref
- QE48-C40
- Role id
- O1
- Stack
- Ontological
- Proposed role type
- world_mechanic
- Effective role summary
- A desired conclusion can influence how a person attends to or interprets supporting information.
- Summary source
- Path
- data/reconciliation/qe48-checkpoint4-resolutions.json
- Collection
- rows
- Input id
- P48-40
- Stack
- Ontological
- Role id
- O1
- Authority
- editorial_semantic_proposal
- Legacy summary ref
- data/reconciliation/qe48-checkpoint4-resolutions.json#P48-40/Ontological/O1
- Adopted family ref
- QEF-O-COG
- Full family path
- Super root
- Family id
- QEF-O-SYS
- Label
- Systems
- Root family
- Family id
- QEF-O-COG
- Label
- Cognitive Processes
- Parent family
- Not specified
- Principle family
- Not specified
- Family precision
- provisional_broad_family
- Review status
- review_required_title_inferred_or_fixture_based
- Human accepted
- False
- Role ref
- P48-40/O1
- Record kind
- active_proposal
- Canonical type supported
- True
- Canonical readiness
- not_assessed_not_approved
Held · inactive · P48-40/E2
Evidence required before reactivation
Compare support for favored and unwelcome explanations using the same stated evidential criteria, looking for serious counterexamples.
- Demonstrate a distinct process that detects goal-motivated manipulation of evidential standards, rather than generic rival-evidence comparison
- Review canonical ownership and whether QE-EX-BIAS/E2 should be referenced rather than duplicated
- Provide source/provenance supporting independent role identity
Complete held record
- Input id
- P48-40
- Stack
- Epistemic
- Role id
- E2
- Original role
- Input id
- P48-40
- Title
- Motivated reasoning
- Owner ref
- QE48-C40
- Role id
- E2
- Stack
- Epistemic
- Proposed role type
- judgment_corrective
- Effective role summary
- Compare support for favored and unwelcome explanations using the same stated evidential criteria, looking for serious counterexamples.
- Summary source
- Path
- data/reconciliation/qe48-checkpoint4-resolutions.json
- Collection
- rows
- Input id
- P48-40
- Stack
- Epistemic
- Role id
- E2
- Authority
- editorial_semantic_proposal
- Legacy summary ref
- data/reconciliation/qe48-checkpoint4-resolutions.json#P48-40/Epistemic/E2
- Adopted family ref
- QEF-E-COMP
- Full family path
- Super root
- Family id
- QEF-E-INF
- Label
- Inference & Updating
- Root family
- Family id
- QEF-E-EVID
- Label
- Evidence Evaluation
- Parent family
- Not specified
- Principle family
- Family id
- QEF-E-COMP
- Label
- Consistent Evidence Comparison
- Family precision
- provisional_principle_family
- Review status
- review_required_title_inferred_or_fixture_based
- Human accepted
- False
- Status
- candidate_independent_role_withheld_pending_evidence
- Reactivation criteria
- Demonstrate a distinct process that detects goal-motivated manipulation of evidential standards, rather than generic rival-evidence comparison
- Review canonical ownership and whether QE-EX-BIAS/E2 should be referenced rather than duplicated
- Provide source/provenance supporting independent role identity
- Reference role
- P48-39/E2
- Overlap case
- R9C-01
- Approved
- False
- Role ref
- P48-40/E2
- Record kind
- held_proposal