QUINTESSENTIALS QE · Knowledge & reasoning

Proposal intake / P48-17

P48-17

Reputation compounds

Current proposed roles · editorial proposals, not accepted Card definitions.

Not accepted
Concept identity review
Input id
P48-17
Original title
Reputation compounds
Identity candidate ref
QE48-C17
Identity review status
identity_and_independent_role_both_on_evidence_hold
Historical roles recovered
False
Accepted identity
False

Card coverage

Identity on hold

Proposed concept boundary: Candidate reputation accumulation distinct from generic compounding, currently on hold.

Open decision

Resolve the recorded evidence and ownership hold before proposing an active role or Card; reputation may decay or change discontinuously.

Missing work

  1. Review concept identity and role ownership before authoring a Card.
  2. Author role-local scope, logic and required method, diagnostic, objective or action content for the selected functions.
  3. Record exact inspected sources and transformations, or explicitly review QE editorial synthesis with assertion-level evidence limits.
  4. Obtain editorial acceptance separately from structural validation.
Complete coverage record
Input id
P48-17
Original title
Reputation compounds
Candidate identity ref
QE48-C17
Proposed concept boundary
Candidate reputation accumulation distinct from generic compounding, currently on hold.
Active role refs
None recorded
Held role refs
  1. P48-17/O1
Authored card ref
Not specified
Fixture identity ref
Not specified
Related authored card refs
  1. QE-EX-TRUST
Ownership case refs
  1. R18C-08
  2. R18C-27
Coverage status
identity_on_hold
Unresolved decision
Resolve the recorded evidence and ownership hold before proposing an active role or Card; reputation may decay or change discontinuously.
Missing work
  1. Review concept identity and role ownership before authoring a Card.
  2. Author role-local scope, logic and required method, diagnostic, objective or action content for the selected functions.
  3. Record exact inspected sources and transformations, or explicitly review QE editorial synthesis with assertion-level evidence limits.
  4. Obtain editorial acceptance separately from structural validation.
Accepted identity
False
Evidence status
title_derived_editorial_proposal_not_verified
No active proposed role. The held role below is inactive.

Held · inactive · P48-17/O1

Evidence required before reactivation

Reputation can compound if retained credible conduct increases a reputation base and the resulting opportunities generate further positive net reputation gains that depend on that base; otherwise it may merely accumulate, stagnate, or decay.

  1. Show a concrete reputation-feedback mechanism where the retained base causally increases later positive net reputation growth
  2. Identify boundary conditions and counterexamples such as reputational decay and saturation
  3. Explain reusable independent mechanism beyond P48-15 general base-dependent compounding
Complete held record
Input id
P48-17
Stack
Ontological
Role id
O1
Original role
Input id
P48-17
Title
Reputation compounds
Owner ref
QE48-C17
Role id
O1
Stack
Ontological
Proposed role type
world_mechanic
Effective role summary
Reputation can compound if retained credible conduct increases a reputation base and the resulting opportunities generate further positive net reputation gains that depend on that base; otherwise it may merely accumulate, stagnate, or decay.
Summary source
Path
data/reconciliation/qe48-checkpoint4-resolutions.json
Collection
rows
Input id
P48-17
Stack
Ontological
Role id
O1
Authority
editorial_semantic_proposal
Legacy summary ref
data/reconciliation/qe48-checkpoint4-resolutions.json#P48-17/Ontological/O1
Adopted family ref
QEF-O-ACC
Full family path
Super root
Family id
QEF-O-TIME
Label
Time and Change
Root family
Family id
QEF-O-ACC
Label
Accumulation
Parent family
Not specified
Principle family
Not specified
Family precision
provisional_broad_family
Review status
review_required_title_inferred_or_fixture_based
Human accepted
False
Status
candidate_independent_role_withheld_pending_evidence
Reactivation criteria
  1. Show a concrete reputation-feedback mechanism where the retained base causally increases later positive net reputation growth
  2. Identify boundary conditions and counterexamples such as reputational decay and saturation
  3. Explain reusable independent mechanism beyond P48-15 general base-dependent compounding
Reference role
P48-15/O1
Overlap case
R9C-04
Approved
False
Role ref
P48-17/O1
Record kind
held_proposal

Ownership comparisons