Proposal intake / P48-09
P48-09
Reversible vs irreversible decisions
Current proposed roles · editorial proposals, not accepted Card definitions.
Not acceptedConcept identity review
- Input id
- P48-09
- Original title
- Reversible vs irreversible decisions
- Identity candidate ref
- QE48-C09
- Identity review status
- candidate_distinct_card_identity
- Historical roles recovered
- False
- Accepted identity
- False
Card coverage
Candidate only
Proposed concept boundary: Cost and feasibility of reversal affect how commitments should be evaluated.
Open decision
Specify reversal costs and thresholds; compare classification, staging and learning-before-commitment roles.
Missing work
- Review concept identity and role ownership before authoring a Card.
- Author role-local scope, logic and required method, diagnostic, objective or action content for the selected functions.
- Record exact inspected sources and transformations, or explicitly review QE editorial synthesis with assertion-level evidence limits.
- Obtain editorial acceptance separately from structural validation.
Complete coverage record
- Input id
- P48-09
- Original title
- Reversible vs irreversible decisions
- Candidate identity ref
- QE48-C09
- Proposed concept boundary
- Cost and feasibility of reversal affect how commitments should be evaluated.
- Active role refs
- P48-09/E1
- P48-09/D1
- Held role refs
- None recorded
- Authored card ref
- Not specified
- Fixture identity ref
- Not specified
- Related authored card refs
- None recorded
- Ownership case refs
- R18C-09
- R18C-14
- R19C-48
- R19C-49
- Coverage status
- candidate_only
- Unresolved decision
- Specify reversal costs and thresholds; compare classification, staging and learning-before-commitment roles.
- Missing work
- Review concept identity and role ownership before authoring a Card.
- Author role-local scope, logic and required method, diagnostic, objective or action content for the selected functions.
- Record exact inspected sources and transformations, or explicitly review QE editorial synthesis with assertion-level evidence limits.
- Obtain editorial acceptance separately from structural validation.
- Accepted identity
- False
- Evidence status
- title_derived_editorial_proposal_not_verified
P48-09/D1 · Decision
Decision implication
When reversal is difficult or uncertainty material, prefer feasible staged commitments, exit conditions, or replaceable choices where the value of flexibility exceeds their costs.
data/reconciliation/qe48-checkpoint4-resolutions.json
Review status and complete proposal
- Input id
- P48-09
- Title
- Reversible vs irreversible decisions
- Owner ref
- QE48-C09
- Role id
- D1
- Stack
- Decision
- Proposed role type
- decision_implication
- Effective role summary
- When reversal is difficult or uncertainty material, prefer feasible staged commitments, exit conditions, or replaceable choices where the value of flexibility exceeds their costs.
- Summary source
- Path
- data/reconciliation/qe48-checkpoint4-resolutions.json
- Collection
- rows
- Input id
- P48-09
- Stack
- Decision
- Role id
- D1
- Authority
- editorial_semantic_proposal
- Legacy summary ref
- data/reconciliation/qe48-checkpoint4-resolutions.json#P48-09/Decision/D1
- Adopted family ref
- QEF-D-REVERSIBLE
- Full family path
- Super root
- Family id
- QEF-D-RISK
- Label
- Risk & Survival
- Root family
- Family id
- QEF-D-EXPOSURE
- Label
- Exposure Management
- Parent family
- Not specified
- Principle family
- Family id
- QEF-D-REVERSIBLE
- Label
- Reversible Commitment
- Family precision
- provisional_principle_family
- Review status
- review_required_title_inferred_or_fixture_based
- Human accepted
- False
- Role ref
- P48-09/D1
- Record kind
- active_proposal
- Canonical type supported
- True
- Canonical readiness
- not_assessed_not_approved
P48-09/E1 · Epistemic
Reasoning method
Assess what parts of a proposed decision can be reversed, the remaining consequences, exit costs, and uncertainty about those estimates.
data/reconciliation/qe48-checkpoint4-resolutions.json
Review status and complete proposal
- Input id
- P48-09
- Title
- Reversible vs irreversible decisions
- Owner ref
- QE48-C09
- Role id
- E1
- Stack
- Epistemic
- Proposed role type
- reasoning_method
- Effective role summary
- Assess what parts of a proposed decision can be reversed, the remaining consequences, exit costs, and uncertainty about those estimates.
- Summary source
- Path
- data/reconciliation/qe48-checkpoint4-resolutions.json
- Collection
- rows
- Input id
- P48-09
- Stack
- Epistemic
- Role id
- E1
- Authority
- editorial_semantic_proposal
- Legacy summary ref
- data/reconciliation/qe48-checkpoint4-resolutions.json#P48-09/Epistemic/E1
- Adopted family ref
- QEF-E-UNC
- Full family path
- Super root
- Family id
- QEF-E-INF
- Label
- Inference & Updating
- Root family
- Family id
- QEF-E-UNC
- Label
- Uncertainty Assessment
- Parent family
- Not specified
- Principle family
- Not specified
- Family precision
- provisional_broad_family
- Review status
- review_required_title_inferred_or_fixture_based
- Human accepted
- False
- Role ref
- P48-09/E1
- Record kind
- active_proposal
- Canonical type supported
- True
- Canonical readiness
- not_assessed_not_approved